Wednesday, December 5, 2007

The moment we force grammar to fine art we start suffocating it.
Discipline should be there but in it’s natural form.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

you cannot escape grammar. even when art breaks syntax, the context remains.

Fictitioustruth said...

bhai, idle thoughts, iska matlab angreezi ya hindi mein samjha sakte ho.

bada eksaan hoga is nacheez par

Anonymous said...

@fictitioustruth
hindi mein anuwad:
आप व्याकरण से छुटकारा नही पा सकते.
जब कला व्याकरण को तोड़ता है, तभ भी उसका सन्दर्भ रह जाता हैं.

p.s. - if my hindi is a little awkward, remember i am only a bengali.

Fictitioustruth said...

bhai saab, anuwaad nahin,matlab samjhna chaha tha.

bahut kripa hogi agar aap dincharya ke bhasha mein apne baat ka vyakhan kare toh.

Anonymous said...

भावार्थ समझना हैं तो पहले भाव को समझो. मेरे कहने का तात्पर्य यह था - की हम जब कोई नियम को तोड़ने का जी जान से प्रयत्न करते हैं, तब हम उस नियम का गुलाम बन जाते हैं. अगर नियम हैं तो वो कुछ कारणवश हैं. अगर नियम तोड़ना भी हैं, तो नियम को समझने की आवश्यकता हैं.

पी. एस. - जैसे मैंने पहले भी कहा. अगर मेरे हिन्दी मैं कुछ गलती हो गई हैं तो मुआफ कर देना. आखिर मैं बंगाली हूँ.

feddabonn said...

disagree with idle about having to know the rules to break them. easier to just do what you have to-when someone starts screaming you'll know you've broken a rule.

no one in hyderabad knows what a red light means. we all just drive until the cop starts screaming.

sometimes i think we hyder baddies could me the next revolution-a return to beautiful anarchy. yes!

sudip bhattacharya said...

the simple point i wanted to make when i wrote the post was- one should not force grammar to art. the key word is "force". it never meant the lack of grammar. but grammar shouldn't supercede the beauty of the thought or feeling.
it's something like sanjay bhansali's sets trying to be so beautiful that we almost forgot that Devdas was meant to be a romantic story. well though i have doubts about the beauty of the sets also. its didn't add anything to the story but surely took away a lot.

grammar should be there but to support the expression not to dilute it.